Comments on: To be right more often, acknowledge the possibility you’re wrong http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/ Honey Bowtie Music blog: where sticky songs meet (occasionally) overdressed ideas. Sweet. Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:15:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: kateo http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1512 kateo Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:41:56 +0000 http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1512 Yeah, it is a little wordy. Yeah, it is a little wordy.

]]> By: anonymous http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1511 anonymous Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:39:49 +0000 http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1511 What a beautiful and moving quote. Great find. <a href="http://thinktrain.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Rob Robinson</a> What a beautiful and moving quote. Great find.

Rob Robinson

]]> By: carrie_apple http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1510 carrie_apple Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:29:47 +0000 http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1510 Karlis has said that exact thing before - but I wish there was a simpler way to sum up. Karlis has said that exact thing before - but I wish there was a simpler way to sum up.

]]> By: huashan http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1509 huashan Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:29:47 +0000 http://www.honeybowtie.com/blog/2007/01/24/to-be-right-more-often-acknowledge-the-possibility-youre-wrong/#comment-1509 I wish that were actually true, but for the 3 years or so that I was in college and reading high end journals mostly what I saw was people publishing obviously false conclusions using bad data or bad data practices. Now, you could say "then those aren't scientists" and I would agree with that, but since they have titles and jobs that declare them scientists and the world in general and even others in their field consider them scientists, that's not a useful definition. I wish that were actually true, but for the 3 years or so that I was in college and reading high end journals mostly what I saw was people publishing obviously false conclusions using bad data or bad data practices. Now, you could say “then those aren’t scientists” and I would agree with that, but since they have titles and jobs that declare them scientists and the world in general and even others in their field consider them scientists, that’s not a useful definition.

]]>