Cute meme!
Stolen from teal7:
Comment anonymously on this entry with three clues about your identity. I will try to guess who you are. With more than 100 people on my friends list, I will guess horribly wrong. Each time I do so, please give me one more anonymous clue.
(Oh, and if you can make the clues things I might plausibly actually know about you, that’d no doubt help a fair bit. 
)
18 Responses to “Cute meme!”
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 12:56 am
Your entry is protected, which means no one can leave anonymous posts. But I tried! Haha, not that you really know me that well, but I gave easy clues :o)
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 1:33 am
D’oh! How do I unprotect it? I tried going into the individual post to edit it but I didn’t see anything that looked right. Do I have to change a global setting in my user preferences?
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 1:36 am
I changed the screening option. Is that the right one?
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 1:41 am
Never mind. I got it. I didn’t realize it was the “friends-only” thing that was keeping anonymous posts from being possible. I tested it and folks can now post anonymous comments.
Except for you,, since I’ll already know it’s you. 
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 3:17 am
What - you wanted easy clues?
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 3:35 am
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 4:54 am
1. I’m a native Nashvillian.
2. I don’t have a full-time job.
3. Clothing is overrated.
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 5:43 am
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 5:55 am
1.I remember you being smitten with
2.We have eaten a meal together
3.One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish
Posted: Jul 3rd, 2004 at 7:46 am
Posted: Jul 4th, 2004 at 1:35 am
Nope, let me clarify the clues…
1 was at polycon in California
2 was at Ann Sathers
3 was on Will’s t-shirt
Posted: Jul 6th, 2004 at 12:44 pm
I know the answer
Posted: Jul 6th, 2004 at 3:19 pm
You would not believe how much of a hilarious double-meaning those clues have if it really had been
Posted: Jul 7th, 2004 at 12:07 am
Yeap you figured it out.
I was going to post parts one and two together but decided that might be to obvious so was more cryptic
Posted: Jul 11th, 2004 at 5:18 am
Oh, you’re good. Or I made my clues too simple. Or both, eh?
Posted: Jul 11th, 2004 at 5:57 am
I think it was also that, at the time, there weren’t very many people actively posting in their journals. It was fairly early on a weekend morning, and I noticed that you posted something else right around that time. I wasn’t seeking out clues like that, but I noticed. So I guess maybe I’m good, and maybe the clues were a little easy to guess, and there was a big fourth clue that helped a lot.
Posted: Jul 11th, 2004 at 5:58 am
Or no, it wasn’t early. It says it was 3:15 PM. That’s funny — I remembered it as being a big clue, and maybe it really wasn’t.
Posted: Jul 11th, 2004 at 6:09 am
Sneaky wench, using extraneous clues :-). Yeah, I’m posting more these days - trying to do it daily, as a discipline of sorts.